Polyurethane Non-Silicone Surfactant applications in PU coatings and adhesives

Polyurethane Non-Silicone Surfactants: Key Components in PU Coatings and Adhesives

Introduction

Polyurethane (PU) coatings and adhesives are ubiquitous in modern industries, prized for their versatility, durability, and range of properties. Achieving optimal performance in these systems often hinges on the careful selection and utilization of surfactants. While silicone-based surfactants have historically dominated the market, concerns regarding migration, recoatability, and potential environmental impact have fueled the development and adoption of non-silicone alternatives. This article delves into the world of polyurethane non-silicone surfactants, exploring their chemical structures, mechanisms of action, advantages, applications, and considerations for formulation in PU coatings and adhesives. The article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of these important additives, emphasizing their role in achieving desired properties and performance characteristics.

1. Definition and Classification

A surfactant, or surface-active agent, is a substance that lowers the surface tension of a liquid, allowing it to spread more easily or reduce interfacial tension between two liquids or a liquid and a solid. In PU systems, surfactants play a critical role in stabilizing emulsions, promoting cell formation (in foams), improving substrate wetting, and preventing defects like pinholes and craters.

Polyurethane non-silicone surfactants are a diverse group of organic compounds designed to perform these functions without relying on a silicone backbone. They can be classified based on their ionic charge:

• Non-ionic Surfactants: These surfactants lack any ionic charge in their hydrophilic head group. They are generally more compatible with a wider range of PU components and are less sensitive to electrolytes. Common examples include polyether polyols, ethoxylated alcohols, and alkylphenol ethoxylates. While alkylphenol ethoxylates are effective, they are facing increasing scrutiny due to environmental concerns.
• Anionic Surfactants: These surfactants possess a negatively charged head group. They are often used to improve emulsion stability and pigment dispersion. Examples include alkyl sulfates, alkyl sulfonates, and fatty acid salts.
• Cationic Surfactants: These surfactants possess a positively charged head group. Their use in PU systems is less common due to potential incompatibility with isocyanates and other negatively charged components. Examples include quaternary ammonium salts.
• Amphoteric Surfactants: These surfactants contain both positive and negative charges, depending on the pH of the solution. They offer a balance of properties and can be used in a variety of applications. Examples include betaines and sulfobetaines.

2. Chemical Structure and Properties

The chemical structure of a non-silicone surfactant dictates its performance characteristics. Generally, these surfactants consist of a hydrophobic (water-repelling) tail and a hydrophilic (water-attracting) head. The balance between these two parts, quantified by the Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance (HLB) value, determines the surfactant’s affinity for oil or water and its effectiveness in different applications.

2.1 Hydrophobic Tail:

• Alkyl Chains: Linear or branched alkyl chains (e.g., C8-C18) are common hydrophobic moieties. Longer chains provide greater hydrophobicity.
• Aromatic Rings: Aromatic rings, such as phenyl or naphthyl groups, can also contribute to hydrophobicity.
• Polypropylene Oxide (PPO) segments: PPO segments are relatively hydrophobic and can be incorporated into the surfactant structure.

2.2 Hydrophilic Head:

• Polyethylene Oxide (PEO) segments: PEO segments are the most common hydrophilic component. The length of the PEO chain determines the water solubility and HLB value.
• Carboxylates (-COO-): Anionic hydrophilic group.
• Sulfonates (-SO3-): Anionic hydrophilic group.
• Sulfates (-OSO3-): Anionic hydrophilic group.
• Quaternary Ammonium (R4N+): Cationic hydrophilic group.
• Amino Oxides (R3N=O): Amphoteric hydrophilic group.

2.3 HLB Value:

The HLB value is a numerical scale (typically 1-20) that indicates the relative hydrophilicity or lipophilicity of a surfactant.

• Low HLB (1-8): Lipophilic, favors oil solubility. Useful for water-in-oil (W/O) emulsions.
• High HLB (8-18): Hydrophilic, favors water solubility. Useful for oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions.
• Intermediate HLB (8-12): Suitable for wetting agents and emulsifiers.

The required HLB of a surfactant depends on the specific PU system and the desired properties. Formulators often blend surfactants with different HLB values to achieve optimal performance.

Table 1: Examples of Non-Silicone Surfactant Structures and Properties

Surfactant Type	Chemical Structure (Simplified)	HLB (Approximate)	Key Properties	Applications
Ethoxylated Alcohol	R-(OCH2CH2)n-OH (R = Alkyl Chain, n = Number of Ethylene Oxide Units)	10-15	Good wetting, emulsification, and foam stabilization.	Waterborne PU coatings, adhesives, and foams.
Polyether Polyol	Polyol Initiator + Propylene Oxide + Ethylene Oxide Blocks	8-18	Excellent emulsification and stabilization of PU systems.	Flexible PU foams, coatings, and adhesives.
Alkyl Sulfate	R-OSO3Na (R = Alkyl Chain)	30-40	High foaming, good detergency.	Aqueous PU dispersions, cleaning agents.
Alkyl Sulfonate	R-SO3Na (R = Alkyl Chain)	25-35	Good wetting and emulsification, resistant to hard water.	Emulsion polymerization of PU, cleaning agents.
Fatty Acid Salt (Soap)	R-COONa (R = Alkyl Chain)	15-20	Emulsification, limited use in PU due to potential reaction with isocyanates.	Historically used, less common now.
Ethoxylated Fatty Acid	R-COO(CH2CH2O)nH (R = Alkyl Chain, n = Number of Ethylene Oxide Units)	8-16	Good emulsification and wetting properties.	PU coatings and adhesives, pigment dispersion.
Amine Oxides	R3N=O (R = Alkyl Chain or Alkyl Ether Chain)	10-18	Good cleaning power, emulsification, and foam boosting; pH dependent.	Hard surface cleaners, detergents, foam boosting in some PU applications.

3. Mechanisms of Action in PU Systems

Non-silicone surfactants influence PU coating and adhesive performance through several key mechanisms:

• Surface Tension Reduction: By lowering the surface tension of the PU formulation, surfactants improve wetting of the substrate. This leads to better adhesion, reduced surface defects (e.g., crawling, orange peel), and improved leveling.
• Emulsification: In waterborne PU systems, surfactants stabilize the emulsion of the hydrophobic PU components in the aqueous phase. This prevents phase separation and ensures a uniform coating or adhesive film. They function by reducing the interfacial tension between the dispersed phase (PU resin, etc.) and the continuous phase (water).
• Foam Stabilization (PU Foams): In PU foam applications, surfactants control the nucleation, growth, and stabilization of gas bubbles. They prevent bubble coalescence and collapse, resulting in a uniform and stable foam structure. They also influence the cell size and cell openness of the foam.
• Pigment Dispersion: Surfactants can improve the dispersion of pigments and fillers in the PU matrix, preventing agglomeration and ensuring uniform color and mechanical properties. They adsorb onto the pigment surface, creating a steric or electrostatic barrier that prevents re-aggregation.
• Cell Regulation (PU Foams): In PU foams, surfactants influence the cell size and structure by affecting the surface tension of the cell membranes. They can promote cell opening, which is important for flexible foams, or cell closing, which is important for rigid foams.

4. Advantages of Non-Silicone Surfactants over Silicone Surfactants

While silicone surfactants offer excellent performance in many PU applications, non-silicone surfactants provide several advantages:

• Improved Recoatability: Silicone surfactants can migrate to the surface of the coating or adhesive film, leading to poor recoatability. Non-silicone surfactants are less prone to migration and thus allow for easier and more reliable recoating.
• Reduced Surface Defects: Excessive use of silicone surfactants can lead to surface defects like cratering and fish eyes. Non-silicone surfactants are often less prone to causing these defects.
• Enhanced Adhesion: In certain applications, non-silicone surfactants can promote better adhesion to specific substrates compared to silicone surfactants, due to their different surface energy characteristics.
• Improved Paintability: Silicone surfactants can interfere with the paintability of coated surfaces. Non-silicone surfactants generally offer better paintability.
• Lower Cost: In some cases, non-silicone surfactants can be more cost-effective than silicone surfactants.
• Environmental Considerations: Some silicone surfactants are based on siloxanes that can be persistent in the environment. Non-silicone surfactants may offer a more environmentally friendly alternative, depending on their specific chemical composition.
• Compatibility: Non-silicone surfactants are often more compatible with other additives in the PU formulation, leading to improved overall performance.

5. Applications in PU Coatings

Non-silicone surfactants are widely used in various types of PU coatings:

• Waterborne PU Coatings: Non-ionic surfactants, such as ethoxylated alcohols and polyether polyols, are commonly used to stabilize the emulsion of the PU resin in water. Anionic surfactants, such as alkyl sulfates, can also be used to improve emulsion stability and pigment dispersion.
• Solventborne PU Coatings: Non-silicone surfactants are used to improve wetting, leveling, and pigment dispersion. They help to create a smooth, uniform, and defect-free coating.
• UV-Curable PU Coatings: Non-silicone surfactants help improve the wetting and leveling of the coating, ensuring a uniform film thickness and preventing defects.
• Powder Coatings: Non-silicone surfactants improve the flow and leveling of the powder coating during the melting and curing process. They also enhance pigment dispersion and prevent caking of the powder.

Table 2: Non-Silicone Surfactant Applications in PU Coatings

Coating Type	Desired Property	Surfactant Type	Mechanism of Action	Examples
Waterborne PU	Emulsion Stability	Ethoxylated Alcohols, Polyether Polyols, Anionic	Reduces interfacial tension between water and PU resin, preventing phase separation.	Ethoxylated nonylphenol (use declining), Polyether polyols with EO/PO blocks, Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS)
Waterborne PU	Wetting & Leveling	Ethoxylated Alcohols, Polyether Polyols	Lowers surface tension, improving substrate wetting and allowing the coating to flow smoothly.	Ethoxylated C12-C14 alcohols, EO/PO block copolymers
Solventborne PU	Wetting & Leveling	Ethoxylated Fatty Acids, Alkylphenol Ethoxylates	Lowers surface tension, improving substrate wetting and allowing the coating to flow smoothly.	Ethoxylated stearic acid, Nonylphenol ethoxylate (use declining), Alkyl modified Polyacrylates
Solventborne PU	Pigment Dispersion	Polymeric Dispersants, Amine Salts	Adsorbs onto pigment surface, creating a steric or electrostatic barrier that prevents agglomeration.	Dispersants based on polyurethanes or polyacrylates with amine functionality, Fatty acid amine salts
UV-Curable PU	Wetting & Leveling	Fluorosurfactants (Non-Silicone), Ethoxylated Alcohols	Lowers surface tension, improving substrate wetting and allowing the coating to flow smoothly.	Fluorinated alkyl esters, Ethoxylated isodecyl alcohol
Powder Coatings	Flow & Leveling	Acrylic Polymers, Polyether Polyols	Reduces surface tension, promoting flow and leveling during the melting and curing process.	Acrylic resins modified with polyether segments, Polyether polyols with low molecular weight
High Solids PU Coatings	Air Release, Defoaming	Polyether Polyols, Modified Acrylics	Facilitates the release of trapped air bubbles, preventing pinholes and craters.	Polyether polyols with specific EO/PO ratios, Acrylic copolymers with defoaming properties

6. Applications in PU Adhesives

Non-silicone surfactants also play a crucial role in PU adhesives, influencing properties such as:

• Wetting and Spreading: Improved wetting of the substrate is essential for good adhesion. Non-silicone surfactants lower the surface tension of the adhesive, allowing it to spread evenly and penetrate into the substrate.
• Adhesion Strength: By promoting better contact between the adhesive and the substrate, surfactants can improve adhesion strength.
• Emulsion Stability (Waterborne Adhesives): In waterborne PU adhesives, surfactants stabilize the emulsion, preventing phase separation and ensuring a uniform adhesive film.
• Foam Control (Foam Adhesives): In PU foam adhesives, surfactants control the cell structure of the foam, influencing its cushioning properties and adhesion.

Table 3: Non-Silicone Surfactant Applications in PU Adhesives

Adhesive Type	Desired Property	Surfactant Type	Mechanism of Action	Examples
Waterborne PU Adhesives	Emulsion Stability	Ethoxylated Alcohols, Polyether Polyols	Reduces interfacial tension between water and PU resin, preventing phase separation.	Ethoxylated fatty alcohols, EO/PO block copolymers
Waterborne PU Adhesives	Wetting & Spreading	Ethoxylated Alcohols, Alkyl Sulfonates	Lowers surface tension, improving substrate wetting and allowing the adhesive to spread evenly.	Ethoxylated branched alcohols, Sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate (DOSS)
Solventborne PU Adhesives	Wetting & Spreading	Ethoxylated Fatty Acids, Polymeric Dispersants	Lowers surface tension, improving substrate wetting and allowing the adhesive to spread evenly.	Ethoxylated oleic acid, Acrylic copolymers with dispersing properties
Hot Melt PU Adhesives	Wetting & Adhesion	Modified Rosin Esters, Fatty Acid Derivatives	Improves wetting of the substrate and promotes adhesion between the adhesive and the substrate.	Rosin esters modified with maleic anhydride, Stearic acid amides
Reactive PU Adhesives	Defoaming, Air Release	Polyether Polyols, Modified Silicones (Low Level)	Facilitates the release of trapped air bubbles, preventing voids and ensuring a strong bond.	Polyether polyols with low molecular weight, small amount of modified silicone defoamer for air release
Foam Adhesives	Cell Structure Control	Polyether Polyols, Silicone Surfactants (Low Level)	Controls the nucleation, growth, and stabilization of gas bubbles, influencing the foam density and cell size.	Polyether polyols with specific EO/PO ratios, small amount of silicone surfactant to control cell openness.

7. Considerations for Formulation

Selecting the right non-silicone surfactant for a specific PU coating or adhesive application requires careful consideration of several factors:

• PU Resin Type: The chemical structure and properties of the PU resin will influence the compatibility and effectiveness of the surfactant.
• Solvent System: The choice of solvent (water or organic solvent) will dictate the type of surfactant that can be used.
• Substrate: The surface energy and chemistry of the substrate will influence the wetting and adhesion characteristics of the surfactant.
• Desired Properties: The desired properties of the coating or adhesive (e.g., gloss, hardness, flexibility, adhesion) will determine the type and concentration of surfactant needed.
• HLB Value: The HLB value of the surfactant should be matched to the specific requirements of the formulation.
• Compatibility with Other Additives: The surfactant should be compatible with other additives in the formulation, such as pigments, fillers, catalysts, and stabilizers.
• Regulatory Compliance: The surfactant should comply with all relevant environmental and safety regulations.
• Foaming tendency: Evaluate the potential for excessive foaming during processing and application. Defoamers might be required.
• Effect on curing: Some surfactants can interfere with the curing process, so it’s important to select a surfactant that does not inhibit crosslinking.
• Migration and blooming: Assess the potential for the surfactant to migrate to the surface of the coating or adhesive over time, leading to discoloration or reduced performance.

8. Future Trends

The development of non-silicone surfactants for PU coatings and adhesives is an ongoing area of research and innovation. Future trends include:

• Bio-based Surfactants: Increasing demand for sustainable and environmentally friendly materials is driving the development of surfactants derived from renewable resources, such as vegetable oils, sugars, and amino acids.
• Novel Surfactant Structures: Researchers are exploring novel surfactant structures with tailored properties to meet the specific requirements of different PU applications.
• Multifunctional Surfactants: Surfactants that can perform multiple functions, such as wetting, emulsification, and pigment dispersion, are gaining popularity as they can simplify formulations and reduce the number of additives required.
• Smart Surfactants: "Smart" or stimuli-responsive surfactants that change their properties in response to external stimuli, such as temperature or pH, are being developed for specialized applications.
• Improved Performance: Continued research is focused on developing non-silicone surfactants that can match or exceed the performance of silicone surfactants in terms of wetting, leveling, adhesion, and foam stabilization.

9. Conclusion

Non-silicone surfactants are essential components in PU coatings and adhesives, playing a critical role in achieving desired performance characteristics. They offer several advantages over silicone surfactants, including improved recoatability, reduced surface defects, enhanced adhesion, and better environmental compatibility. By carefully selecting and formulating with non-silicone surfactants, formulators can create high-performance PU coatings and adhesives that meet the demanding requirements of a wide range of applications. Continued research and development in this area will lead to the development of even more effective and sustainable non-silicone surfactants in the future.

Literature Sources

• Ashton, V.J., "Surface Coatings: Raw Materials and Their Usage, Volume I: Raw Materials." Springer, 1988.
• Blackwell, J., "Polymeric Materials: Structure, Properties, Applications." Springer, 2018.
• Calvo, L., et al. "Waterborne polyurethane dispersions for coatings: recent advances and future trends." Progress in Organic Coatings 72.3 (2011): 287-306.
• Randall, D., and S. Lee. The Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
• Wicks, Z. W., et al. "Organic Coatings: Science and Technology." John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
• Ash, M., and I. Ash. Handbook of Industrial Surfactants. Synapse Information Resources, 2014.
• Holmberg, K., et al. Surfactants and Polymers in Aqueous Solution. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
• Rosen, M.J., and J.T. Kunjappu. Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
• Sonnenschein, M.F. and Fernelius, W.C., "Surface Active Agents: Chemistry and Technology." Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 1952, 44, 1470-1476.
• Schwartz, A.M. and Perry, J.W., "Surface Active Agents: Their Chemistry and Technology." Interscience Publishers, 1949.

Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com