Polyurethane Non-Silicone Surfactant suitability for casting elastomer applications

Polyurethane Non-Silicone Surfactants in Elastomer Casting: A Comprehensive Overview

Introduction

Polyurethane (PU) elastomers are a versatile class of materials widely used in various applications due to their tunable mechanical properties, excellent abrasion resistance, and chemical resistance. The casting process, a common method for producing PU elastomers, involves pouring a liquid mixture of isocyanate and polyol components into a mold, followed by curing to form a solid part. In this process, surfactants play a crucial role in controlling surface tension, promoting uniform mixing, preventing air entrapment, and improving the overall quality of the final product. While silicone surfactants have been traditionally favored, non-silicone surfactants are gaining increasing attention due to concerns related to migration, paintability, and specific regulatory requirements. This article provides a comprehensive overview of polyurethane non-silicone surfactants in elastomer casting, covering their types, mechanisms of action, advantages, limitations, applications, and selection criteria.

1. Definition and Classification of Surfactants

A surfactant, short for "surface active agent," is a substance that lowers the surface tension of a liquid, the interfacial tension between two liquids, or the interfacial tension between a liquid and a solid. Surfactants are amphiphilic molecules, meaning they possess both hydrophilic (water-loving) and hydrophobic (water-repelling) regions. This dual nature allows them to adsorb at interfaces, altering their properties.

Surfactants are broadly classified based on the nature of their hydrophilic head group:

• Anionic Surfactants: Carry a negative charge (e.g., sulfonates, sulfates, carboxylates).
• Cationic Surfactants: Carry a positive charge (e.g., quaternary ammonium salts).
• Nonionic Surfactants: Have no charge (e.g., ethoxylated alcohols, esters, amides).
• Amphoteric (Zwitterionic) Surfactants: Can carry either a positive or negative charge depending on the pH of the solution (e.g., betaines, sultaines).

In the context of polyurethane elastomer casting, nonionic and anionic surfactants are the most commonly employed non-silicone options.

2. Role of Surfactants in Polyurethane Elastomer Casting

Surfactants perform several critical functions in the polyurethane elastomer casting process:

• Surface Tension Reduction: Lowering the surface tension of the liquid mixture facilitates wetting of the mold surface, leading to improved mold filling and reduced surface defects.
• Foam Stabilization/Defoaming: Depending on the surfactant type and concentration, it can either stabilize or destabilize bubbles formed during the mixing and curing process. Defoaming is crucial to prevent air entrapment, which can weaken the elastomer and compromise its appearance.
• Emulsification: Facilitates the mixing of incompatible components, such as polyol and isocyanate, ensuring a homogeneous reaction mixture.
• Cell Size Regulation (for Foams): In the production of polyurethane foams, surfactants are essential for controlling cell size and distribution, influencing the foam’s density and mechanical properties. While this article focuses on elastomers, the principles of cell size regulation are relevant to understanding surfactant behavior.
• Wetting and Leveling: Improves the wetting and leveling of the liquid mixture on the mold surface, resulting in a smooth and uniform surface finish.
• Dispersion: Aids in the dispersion of fillers and pigments within the polyurethane matrix, ensuring uniform color and improved mechanical properties.
• Demolding: Some surfactants can act as internal mold release agents, facilitating the removal of the cured elastomer from the mold.

3. Polyurethane Non-Silicone Surfactant Types and Mechanisms

Several types of non-silicone surfactants are used in polyurethane elastomer casting. Each type has unique properties and mechanisms of action:

• Ethoxylated Alcohols (Nonionic): These are widely used due to their effectiveness, relatively low cost, and availability in a wide range of molecular weights and ethylene oxide (EO) content. The hydrophilic portion is provided by the ethoxylation, and the hydrophobic portion by the alkyl chain.

  • Mechanism: Ethoxylated alcohols reduce surface tension by adsorbing at the air-liquid interface, with the hydrophobic alkyl chain oriented towards the air and the hydrophilic EO chain towards the liquid. They also improve wetting and emulsification by reducing interfacial tension.

  • Product Parameters (Example):

    Parameter	Value	Unit
    Chemical Name	Trideceth-6
    Appearance	Clear Liquid
    HLB Value	11.7
    Cloud Point	45	°C
    Viscosity (25°C)	30	cP
    Active Content	100	%

• Ethoxylated Esters (Nonionic): Similar to ethoxylated alcohols, but with an ester linkage between the hydrophobic and hydrophilic portions. They often exhibit improved hydrolytic stability compared to ethoxylated alcohols, especially in acidic or alkaline environments.

  • Mechanism: Similar to ethoxylated alcohols, providing surface tension reduction, wetting, and emulsification. The ester linkage can also contribute to improved compatibility with certain polyurethane formulations.

  • Product Parameters (Example):

    Parameter	Value	Unit
    Chemical Name	PEG-10 Sunflower Glycerides
    Appearance	Clear Liquid
    HLB Value	12.5
    Cloud Point	60	°C
    Viscosity (25°C)	50	cP
    Active Content	100	%

• Ethoxylated Fatty Acids (Nonionic): Derived from natural fatty acids, offering a renewable and biodegradable alternative. Their performance depends on the specific fatty acid and the degree of ethoxylation.

  • Mechanism: Surface tension reduction and emulsification, similar to other ethoxylated nonionic surfactants. The fatty acid component can contribute to improved lubricity and mold release properties.

  • Product Parameters (Example):

    Parameter	Value	Unit
    Chemical Name	PEG-20 Glyceryl Stearate
    Appearance	Paste
    HLB Value	13.0
    Melting Point	30-35	°C
    Acid Value	<2	mg KOH/g
    Active Content	100	%

• Sulfonates (Anionic): Strong anionic surfactants known for their excellent detergency and emulsification properties. They are generally more effective at lower concentrations compared to nonionic surfactants.

  • Mechanism: Sulfonates reduce surface tension by adsorbing at interfaces with the negatively charged sulfonate group oriented towards the aqueous phase. They form stable emulsions and can effectively disperse pigments and fillers.

  • Product Parameters (Example):

    Parameter	Value	Unit
    Chemical Name	Sodium Dodecylbenzene Sulfonate
    Appearance	White Powder
    Active Content	90	%
    pH (1% solution)	7-9
    Moisture Content	<2	%

• Phosphate Esters (Anionic): Offer a combination of detergency, emulsification, and corrosion inhibition properties. They are often used in applications where metal contact is involved.

  • Mechanism: Similar to sulfonates, phosphate esters reduce surface tension due to the negatively charged phosphate group. They can also complex with metal ions, providing corrosion protection.

  • Product Parameters (Example):

    Parameter	Value	Unit
    Chemical Name	Tridecyl Alcohol Phosphate Ester
    Appearance	Clear Liquid
    Acid Value	150-170	mg KOH/g
    pH (1% solution)	2-3
    Active Content	95	%

• Fluorosurfactants (Nonionic/Anionic): While often more expensive, fluorosurfactants provide exceptional surface tension reduction due to the unique properties of fluorine. They are used in demanding applications where very low surface tension is required. Although considered "non-silicone", their environmental impact is a significant concern. They are becoming increasingly regulated.

  • Mechanism: The highly hydrophobic fluorocarbon chain provides extremely low surface tension, resulting in excellent wetting and leveling properties.

  • Product Parameters (Example – Note: Data might be limited due to proprietary nature and environmental concerns):

    Parameter	Value	Unit
    Chemical Name	Proprietary Fluorosurfactant
    Appearance	Clear Liquid
    Active Content	Variable	%
    Surface Tension (0.1% solution)	<20	mN/m

4. Advantages and Limitations of Non-Silicone Surfactants

The choice between silicone and non-silicone surfactants depends on the specific application requirements. Non-silicone surfactants offer several advantages:

• Paintability: Non-silicone surfactants generally do not interfere with the paint adhesion to the polyurethane elastomer surface. Silicone surfactants, due to their inherent silicone chemistry, can migrate to the surface and prevent proper paint adhesion, leading to defects like "fish eyes."
• Reduced Migration: Non-silicone surfactants tend to exhibit lower migration rates compared to some silicone surfactants. This is crucial in applications where contact with food or skin is involved.
• Lower Cost: In many cases, non-silicone surfactants are more cost-effective than silicone surfactants.
• Regulatory Compliance: Certain silicone surfactants are facing increasing regulatory scrutiny due to environmental concerns. Non-silicone alternatives may offer better compliance in specific regions.
• Improved Compatibility: Certain non-silicone surfactants can exhibit better compatibility with specific polyurethane formulations, leading to improved performance.

However, non-silicone surfactants also have limitations:

• Surface Tension Reduction: Generally, non-silicone surfactants do not reduce surface tension as effectively as some silicone surfactants, particularly those containing fluorosilicone groups.
• Foam Control: Achieving optimal foam control (defoaming or foam stabilization) can be more challenging with non-silicone surfactants, requiring careful selection and optimization of the surfactant type and concentration.
• Hydrolytic Stability: Some non-silicone surfactants, such as ethoxylated esters, can be susceptible to hydrolysis in acidic or alkaline environments.
• Limited Availability: The range of non-silicone surfactants specifically tailored for polyurethane elastomer casting may be more limited compared to the variety of silicone surfactants available.
• Potential Impact on Mechanical Properties: The selection of the wrong surfactant, or the use of excessive surfactant concentration, can negatively impact the mechanical properties of the final elastomer.

5. Applications of Polyurethane Non-Silicone Surfactants in Elastomer Casting

Non-silicone surfactants are used in a wide range of polyurethane elastomer casting applications:

• Automotive Parts: Bumpers, seals, gaskets, and interior components benefit from the paintability and reduced migration characteristics of non-silicone surfactants.
• Industrial Rollers: Non-silicone surfactants contribute to improved surface finish and uniform hardness in industrial rollers used in various manufacturing processes.
• Sporting Goods: Skateboard wheels, rollerblade wheels, and other sporting goods require durable and abrasion-resistant elastomers, where non-silicone surfactants can play a crucial role.
• Medical Devices: Certain medical devices require biocompatible elastomers with low migration characteristics. Non-silicone surfactants are often preferred in these applications.
• Construction Materials: Sealants, adhesives, and coatings used in construction benefit from the improved adhesion and weatherability provided by non-silicone surfactants.
• Consumer Goods: A wide variety of consumer goods, including shoe soles, furniture components, and electronic housings, utilize polyurethane elastomers produced with non-silicone surfactants.
• Adhesives and Sealants: Non-silicone surfactants can improve the wetting, adhesion, and flexibility of polyurethane-based adhesives and sealants.

6. Selection Criteria for Polyurethane Non-Silicone Surfactants

Selecting the appropriate non-silicone surfactant for a specific polyurethane elastomer casting application requires careful consideration of several factors:

• Polyol and Isocyanate Chemistry: The chemical structure of the polyol and isocyanate components significantly influences the surfactant’s compatibility and performance.
• Desired Properties of the Elastomer: The desired mechanical properties, surface finish, and chemical resistance of the final elastomer should be considered.
• Processing Conditions: The mixing speed, temperature, and curing time can affect the surfactant’s performance.
• Foam Control Requirements: Whether defoaming or foam stabilization is required, the surfactant must be chosen accordingly.
• Paintability Requirements: If the elastomer needs to be painted, a non-silicone surfactant that does not interfere with paint adhesion is essential.
• Migration Requirements: If low migration is critical, a non-silicone surfactant with low migration potential should be selected.
• Regulatory Compliance: The surfactant should comply with all relevant environmental and safety regulations.
• Cost Considerations: The cost of the surfactant should be balanced against its performance and benefits.
• HLB Value: The Hydrophilic-Lipophilic Balance (HLB) value is a measure of the relative hydrophilicity and lipophilicity of a surfactant. Surfactants with an HLB value appropriate for the specific polyol and isocyanate system should be selected. HLB values are often provided by the surfactant manufacturer.
• Cloud Point: For ethoxylated nonionic surfactants, the cloud point (the temperature at which the surfactant becomes insoluble in water) should be considered. The cloud point should be higher than the processing temperature to ensure the surfactant remains effective.
• Compatibility Testing: Before large-scale production, it is crucial to conduct compatibility testing to ensure that the chosen surfactant is compatible with the specific polyurethane formulation and does not negatively impact the elastomer’s properties. This testing should include visual inspection, viscosity measurements, and mechanical property testing.
• Supplier Expertise: Consult with surfactant suppliers to obtain recommendations and technical support based on their expertise.

Table 1: Comparison of Common Non-Silicone Surfactant Types

Surfactant Type	Advantages	Limitations	Typical Applications
Ethoxylated Alcohols	Widely available, cost-effective, good wetting.	Limited surface tension reduction compared to silicone, potential hydrolysis	General purpose elastomers, automotive parts, industrial rollers.
Ethoxylated Esters	Improved hydrolytic stability compared to ethoxylated alcohols.	Can be more expensive than ethoxylated alcohols.	Elastomers requiring improved chemical resistance, adhesives.
Ethoxylated Fatty Acids	Renewable, biodegradable, can improve lubricity.	Performance depends on fatty acid and ethoxylation degree.	Sporting goods, consumer goods, applications where bio-based materials are preferred.
Sulfonates	Excellent detergency and emulsification, effective at low concentrations.	Can be pH-sensitive, may not be compatible with all systems.	Pigment dispersion, applications requiring strong emulsification.
Phosphate Esters	Detergency, emulsification, corrosion inhibition.	Can be acidic, may affect the curing reaction.	Applications involving metal contact, corrosion-resistant coatings.
Fluorosurfactants	Exceptional surface tension reduction.	High cost, environmental concerns, increasing regulation.	Demanding applications requiring extremely low surface tension.

Table 2: Checklist for Selecting a Non-Silicone Surfactant

Criteria	Questions to Consider
Chemical Compatibility	Is the surfactant compatible with the polyol and isocyanate chemistry? Will it interfere with the curing reaction?
Performance Requirements	What surface tension reduction is required? Is defoaming or foam stabilization needed? What level of wetting and leveling is necessary?
Elastomer Properties	What mechanical properties are required? Will the surfactant affect the hardness, tensile strength, or elongation of the elastomer?
Processing Conditions	What are the mixing speed, temperature, and curing time? Is the surfactant stable under these conditions?
Application Requirements	Does the elastomer need to be painted? Is low migration critical? Are there any specific regulatory requirements?
Cost and Availability	What is the cost of the surfactant? Is it readily available? Are there any lead time issues?
Environmental Considerations	Is the surfactant environmentally friendly? Does it comply with all relevant environmental regulations?
Supplier Support	Does the supplier provide technical support and assistance with surfactant selection and optimization?
HLB Value and Cloud Point (if applicable)	Is the HLB value appropriate for the system? Is the cloud point higher than the processing temperature?

7. Future Trends and Developments

The field of polyurethane non-silicone surfactants is constantly evolving, driven by the need for improved performance, sustainability, and regulatory compliance. Some key trends and developments include:

• Bio-based Surfactants: Increased focus on developing surfactants derived from renewable resources, such as plant oils and sugars.
• Tailored Surfactants: Development of surfactants specifically designed for particular polyurethane formulations and applications.
• Smart Surfactants: Surfactants that respond to changes in temperature, pH, or other environmental factors, allowing for greater control over the casting process.
• Low-VOC Surfactants: Surfactants with low volatile organic compound (VOC) content to reduce emissions and improve air quality.
• Nanomaterial-Based Surfactants: Incorporation of nanomaterials, such as nanoparticles and nanotubes, into surfactants to enhance their performance.
• Advanced Characterization Techniques: The use of advanced characterization techniques, such as interfacial rheology and surface tension measurements, to better understand the behavior of surfactants in polyurethane systems.
• Computational Modeling: Computational modeling is increasingly being used to predict the performance of surfactants in polyurethane formulations, reducing the need for extensive experimental testing.

Conclusion

Polyurethane non-silicone surfactants are essential additives in the elastomer casting process, playing a crucial role in controlling surface tension, promoting uniform mixing, preventing air entrapment, and improving the overall quality of the final product. While silicone surfactants have been traditionally favored, non-silicone alternatives are gaining increasing attention due to concerns related to paintability, migration, and regulatory compliance. A careful selection of the appropriate non-silicone surfactant, based on the specific application requirements and a thorough understanding of its properties and mechanisms of action, is crucial for achieving optimal performance and producing high-quality polyurethane elastomers. Continued research and development efforts are focused on developing more sustainable, high-performing, and tailored non-silicone surfactants to meet the evolving needs of the polyurethane industry.

Literature Sources:

1. Ash, M., & Ash, I. (2004). Handbook of preservatives. Synapse Information Resources.
2. Holmberg, K., Jönsson, B., Kronberg, B., & Lindman, B. (2003). Surfactants and polymers in aqueous solution. John Wiley & Sons.
3. Myers, D. (2006). Surfaces, interfaces, and colloids: Principles and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
4. Rand, L., & Reegen, S. L. (1974). Polyurethane technology. Interscience Publishers.
5. Oertel, G. (Ed.). (1993). Polyurethane handbook. Hanser Gardner Publications.
6. Wicks, Z. W., Jones, F. N., & Pappas, S. P. (1999). Organic coatings: Science and technology. John Wiley & Sons.
7. Scheirs, J. (Ed.). (2003). Modern polyesters: Chemistry and technology of polyesters and copolyesters. John Wiley & Sons.
8. Calvo, L., et al. "Influence of surfactants on the processing and properties of polyurethane foams." Journal of Applied Polymer Science (Year and Volume/Issue details needed for a proper citation).
9. Rosthauser, J. W., & Ulrich, H. "Polyurethanes in coatings." Chemistry and Technology of Isocyanates (Year and Volume/Issue details needed for a proper citation).
10. Tadros, T. F. (2014). Emulsions and emulsion stability. John Wiley & Sons.

Sales Contact：sales@newtopchem.com